As I wrote the title out for this post I found myself pondering the choice of the book's name. I like the name, The Alchemist, but at the same time the book could easily have been called something else. The alchemist played a key role in Santiago's journey, but so did several others. Would the book have been as popular if it was called Santiago? The Shepherd? The Quest? The King of Salem? The personal legend? What do other people think? I don't normally question an author's title, but in this case I find it intriguing because the conciseness of the story means the title has to have real meaning.
As for the story itself, I found it to be a charming little tale with lots of lessons and a happy ending. I enjoyed reading the book, but it's easy to see why it became so popular. Coelho's universalism appeals to people in all walks of life, all religions, all times. It is a feel good story that rolls multiple religions, mysticism and psychology into one sweet little package that appeals to most people. I of course do not agree with many of the religious implications made in the book, but I did find it intriguing. I appreciated the story and enjoyed reading the book. I'm actually glad it was on the shorter side though because in my opinion to draw it out would have made it stale, sappy and not nearly as good a story. Good job on Coelho's part, keeping it brief.
Honest truth here, I nearly laughed out loud at the end when I realized the treasure was buried right where the story started. It was one of those bang head against the wall moments while shaking one's head and laughing. Poor Santiago! I did appreciate that he actually found a real treasure and the implication was that he could go back and marry the girl he loved. So often the "treasure" in a story is figurative or a lesson learned and it's nice to have the hero discover an actual treasure for once. The beauty of it though is that he gained so much else in his journey to find it. If nothing else the book was a good reminder that God does work all things out for our good and that He is teaching us valuable lessons along the road of life as we strive for our own eternal treasure.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I thought the title referred to Santiago as the alchemist. Since the alchemist from the oasis defined an alchemist as someone who was evolving and trying to better him/herself, and that's what Santiago did, that's what we all should do, etc. Alchemy wasn't turning lead into gold, but achieving one's Personal Legend.
I think I agree with Sarah's opinion on the title. that makes sense.
I had a thought. There was a book (kid's book) I had to read for class and it dealt with alchemy and I really, really didn't like it. I think maybe I'd got issue with metal. :)
I hadn't thought of that...it makes sense and a good title. I'm still wondering if any of the other titles would have worked though.
~Emily~
How cool is that, we're getting some outside views. Anyway, I'll echo what's been said. The Alchemist was definitely referring to Santiago.
I'm not so sure that a treasure was really needed. The true treasure for Santiago was the journey. He came to know and understand himself and the world in which he lives.
Post a Comment