Friday, February 8, 2008

The End.

So, the final chapter went a long way towards me liking this book. The final assessment that "We'd let Austen into our lives, and now we were all either married or dating" seems especially contrived and disturbing. Although, more and more as I think about it, I do see the parallels between the character(s) and the book they hosted. Jocelyn is the busy-body match maker like Emma, who after trying to set her friend up (minor confusion ensues) decides to take a man for herself. Sylvia is the quiet one who keeps everything inside, while Allegra is passionate and reckless, like Elinor and Marianne Dashwood. Bernadette, always disheveled like Elizabeth after walking to Netherfield, is an older version of Elizabeth infinitely intriguing and marriageable, though not desperate. An interesting surpising notable turn with Daniel being Anne. Is Grigg then Catherine? And Prudie Fanny?

I'm torn between seeing Fowler as being clever or being a plagiarist. I love Bridget Jones's Diary and think Fielding terribly clever, so I guess I need to be fair across the board. (Or maybe Fowler is less clever because she's copying Fielding, not Austen). This paralleling does seem to give a little more point to the story. Perhaps the struggle is that there's too many layers. Each of Austen's heroines is a rich complex character that could deserve a whole update on her own (see BJD) and trying to put them all in one story makes for a lot of breadth and "hey, that's nifty" moments, but provides little depth. Once I'd determined what I see as less and less subtle connections, the more Fowler's characters have very little development of their own and rely on the audience's knowledge/love/appreciation of Austen's characters to be transfered to her own.

In regards to Jocelyn's question (#2), I used to watch Wishbone with one of the boys I babysat in high school. I thought it was awesome. Though I don't remember any Austen adaptations (apparently there are two "Furst Impressions" and "Pup Fiction"), I would certainly love to see them. I doubt Jocelyn would.

7 comments:

ec said...

i loved wishbone too!

And i was wrong about Grigg. Oh well. I can't say that match made me happy. Ah well!

Chremdacasi said...

Can you explain what you mean by the match didn't make you happy?

ec said...

cause it seemed forced. there was no like joy about it, i must say. i don't know it was just blah.

Chremdacasi said...

I must say I'm impressed by the connections you made between Austen's characters and Fowler's characters. I certainly hadn't gotten that far!
~Emily~

shoppergrl said...

I agree with you that the author seems to rely on the reader's love/knowledge of Austen to ultimately enjoy this book, Sarah. How confused were you, Chris, having not read many of the books?

Chremdacasi said...

Since they didn't do too much actual discussion of the book, I didn't feel that confused. Perhaps I might have missed some of the depth and genius of the book had it existed. However, based on what most of you are saying, it doesn't sound like Fowler did that good of a job of really reflecting Austen anyway. I really think that the biggest failing with this book was even trying to use Austen at all. It would be a lot closer to a decent read if it had not made pretenses of somehow being related to Austen's works.

Chremdacasi said...

--Chris-- (dang it did it again, although at least Emily's good at signing them, so generally, if its not signed you can probably assume its her)